IBM dangles carrot of full encryption to captivate buyers to new z14 mainframe


IBM is doing its damnedest to keep the mainframe applicable in a complicated context, and trust it or not, there are copiousness of beast companies via the universe who still use those corpse from the beginning days of computing. Today, the company denounced the z14, its latest z-Series mainframe, which comes with the substantial draw of full encryption.

Is that adequate for even corporate giants to bombard out the mix for one of these computing behemoths? IBM’s ubiquitous manager of z Systems Ross Mauri says the company spent two years articulate to 150 business to get a hold on accurately what it would take for them to upgrade their stream mainframe technology, and what they kept conference was “encrypt all so we don’t have to worry about it.”

And that’s precisely what Mauri says IBM set out to do with the latest release. “[Full Encryption] was the many indispensable capability, and it solves a real-world problem. There’s a cyber fight out there with rarely saved groups looking for information and getting it. Our purpose [with z14 encryption] is shutting that down,” he said.

The way they are doing it is by encrypting every turn of the system, and then storing all inside encrypted containers. What’s more, if the complement detects an attack like malware or other intrusion, it has been designed to close itself down automatically. As Mauri said, even if hackers could somehow get by all of these defenses, the encryption would describe the information useless.

Peter Rutten, an researcher with IDC says all-encompassing encryption is clearly the pivotal to this release. “It’s like a confidence sweeping opposite the whole complement — database, applications, information at rest, information in flight, APIs, etc. — that can just be incited on, rather than manually picking and selecting what to encrypt, which typically has led to much [data] remaining unencrypted,” he explained.

Beyond pristine encryption, business also told IBM they wanted this capability delivered in a cost-effective way. Of course, IBM is earnest this, and has suggested a new pricing strategy called a “container pricing model,” but Mauri wouldn’t plead details, so it’s formidable to know accurately how the company defines “cost-effective.”

Pund-IT researcher Charles King says, however, that the enclosure pricing proceed has the intensity to be some-more cost-effective in the prolonged run than progressing mainframe pricing schemes. “Container pricing is a some-more stretchable proceed that should outcome in complement billing some-more accurately reflecting the volume of work the complement is used to accomplish [a given task], so making the z14 (and z13, given enclosure pricing will also be accessible for those systems) some-more cost-effective,” King said.

All that said, it’s substantially going to take some-more than sum encryption for a company to open for a mainframe unless it’s core to their business, according to researcher Roger L. Kay from the firm, Endpoint Technologies Associates, Inc. “No, we don’t consider a company would buy a mainframe just for the encryption. But companies that need mainframes to run the fortitude of large, formidable business systems will find the upgrade to z14 worthwhile,” he said.

Mauri wouldn’t plead specific sales projections, but he sounded assured that the latest z indication was going to sell well. After some-more than two years of articulate to customers, and building the accurate complement they asked for, it would seem he has every reason to.

Write comment

Share with: Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Wordpress Googlebuzz Myspace Gmail Newsvine Favorites More
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.