GCSE examination error: Board incidentally rewrites Shakespeare

Size:

Exam room

One of the country’s biggest hearing boards, OCR, has certified to an blunder in Friday’s English Literature GCSE exam, taken by around 14,000 teenagers.

The mistake associated to a doubt on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in which the family credentials of a pivotal character, Tybalt, was churned up.

It suggested he is a Montague when in fact he is a Capulet.

The house apologised and pronounced no possibilities would remove out, but conduct teachers pronounced the blunder was “serious”.

Exams regulator, Ofqual, pronounced the occurrence was unsuitable and that it would be “closely monitoring OCR’s review of how this occurrence occurred”.

Geoff Barton, ubiquitous secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, pronounced when possibilities see errors in a paper it can criticise their confidence.

‘Absolutely fuming’

He added: “Candidates have every right to design that awarding bodies finish a full check on hearing papers to safeguard that they don’t knowledge such problems.

“Similarly, schools and colleges have to compensate thousands of pounds a year to hearing play and are entitled to better peculiarity declaration than this.

“This appears to be a critical blunder and it will have caused highlight and regard to candidates.”

However, some students reacting to the hearing on Twitter pronounced that they had squandered time on the question, while teachers also spoke out.

Image copyright
Twitter

One pupil, Sophie Elder, 16, from Derbyshire, said: “I got to the question, we review it, and review it again and suspicion that doesn’t make sense.

“It really threw me off – it had been excellent until then, and then this happened.”

She added: “We had all tried so tough and done so much effort, and then for the house to disaster it up, it’s just terrible.

“It’s so distracting – thereafter everybody was so worried and stressed that they had got it wrong. You don’t design something like that on your exam.”

OCR pronounced about 14,000 students out of around 700,000 took the exam, but it is not transparent how many tackled the question, which asked students: “How does Shakespeare benefaction the ways in which Tybalt’s loathing of the Capulets influences the outcome of the play? Refer to this remove from Act 1 Scene 5 and elsewhere in the play.”

In a statement, the hearing house said: “We’re wakeful of an blunder in today’s OCR GCSE English Literature paper.

“We apologize and will put things right when the hearing is noted and graded so no tyro need worry about being disadvantaged. We are questioning as a matter of coercion how this got by the declaration processes.”

Image copyright
Twitter

Russell Hobby, ubiquitous secretary of school leaders’ kinship NAHT, said: “After two years of study it’s not excusable for students to face such a simple blunder in their hearing papers.

“OCR are rightly apologetic but just accurately how they introduce to symbol this sold paper will leave many students, their schools and their relatives with an concerned wait for their results.

“OCR need to be quite open to any requests for a re-mark if students feel that their efforts have not been scrupulously graded.”

Ofqual added: “We will be scrutinising how OCR intends to brand and minimise the impact on these students. We will be closely monitoring OCR’s review of how this occurrence occurred and seeking soundness per its other papers this summer.”

Write comment

Share with: Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Wordpress Googlebuzz Myspace Gmail Newsvine Favorites More
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.